Size or Content of the Pie? Source of Income and Perceived Income Adequacy of Older Europeans.

While public pensions are usually the main source of income in old age, other sources of income may have various consequences for pensioners' economic well-being across households and countries. In this study, we analyze how perceived income adequacy of older Europeans is shaped by the source and the income level. We hypothesize that the source of income can be related to a household's perceived income adequacy beyond the money it provides. We distinguish four categories of income sources: (old age) pensions, other social benefits, work, and capital. We show that the source of income is related to perceived adequacy beyond the money it provides. Compared with pensions, income from other social benefits or work is associated with lower, and income from capital with higher perceptions of adequacy. Perceived adequacy of income from different sources varied further across the household income level. The results convey important messages to the policy makers. Pensions are a powerful policy tool, as they provide positive externalities beyond their monetary value. Attention should also be paid to the low-income households' possibilities to save.

Violent behaviour in a forensic psychiatric hospital in Finland: an analysis of violence incident reports.

The aim of this paper was to explore the frequency and provocation of physically violent incidents in a Finnish forensic psychiatric hospital. Three years (2007-2009) of violent incident reports were analysed retrospectively. The data were analysed by content analysis, and statistically by Poisson regression analysis. During the study period a total of 840 incidents of physical violence occurred. Six main categories were found to describe the provocation of violence where three of these categories seemed to be without a specified reason (61%), and three represented a reaction to something (36%). The risk for violent behaviour was highest for the civil patients (RR = 11.96; CI 95% 9.43-15.18; P < 0.001), compared to criminal patients (RR = 1). The civil patients represented 36.7% of the patients, and in 43.6% of the studied patient days, they caused 89.8% of the reported violence incidents. Patients undergoing a forensic mental examination did not frequently behave aggressively (RR = 1.97; CI 95% 0.91-4.28). These results can be used in the reorganization of health-care practices and the allocation of resources.